The House Oversight Committee voted 24-19 Wednesday to subpoena Attorney General Pam Bondi, requiring her to answer questions about the Justice Department's handling of the Epstein files. The subpoena passed with a bipartisan coalition: every Democrat present, plus five Republicans—Tim Burchett of Tennessee, Michael Cloud of Texas, Lauren Boebert of Colorado, Scott Perry of Pennsylvania, and Rep. Nancy Mace of South Carolina, who introduced the measure.
The bipartisan vote signals deep frustration across the political spectrum with how the DOJ has managed the release of documents from the Jeffrey Epstein sex-trafficking investigation. This is the latest escalation in months of congressional pressure on the department over transparency.
Rep. Mace and other lawmakers assert that millions more documents exist but have not been made public. According to Mace, three million documents have been released so far, yet videos, audio recordings, and logs remain missing.
Some members of Congress with access to unredacted documents allege that the DOJ has removed previously available files. The DOJ has not publicly responded to these assertions.
After the Epstein Files Transparency Act passed nearly unanimously, the DOJ was legally required to release all its files on the case. Instead, the department announced it would withhold millions of pages.
The disagreement between what the DOJ claims it has released and what lawmakers assert remains unreleased has become the focal point of this investigation. The subpoena demands that Bondi produce documents and appear before the committee to answer questions about the discrepancies.
Bondi now faces a legal obligation to appear before the committee and answer questions under oath about the DOJ's document retention and release decisions. The subpoena carries the weight of congressional authority and potential contempt charges if she refuses to comply. No hearing date has been set, leaving uncertain when—or whether—Bondi will testify under oath.
The House Oversight Committee voted 24-19 Wednesday to subpoena Attorney General Pam Bondi, demanding she answer questions about the Justice Department's handling of the Epstein files. The subpoena passed with an unusual coalition: every Democrat present, plus five Republicans—Tim Burchett of Tennessee, Michael Cloud of Texas, Lauren Boebert of Colorado, Scott Perry of Pennsylvania, and Rep. Nancy Mace of South Carolina, who introduced the measure.
The bipartisan vote signals deep frustration across the political spectrum with how the DOJ has managed the release of documents from the Jeffrey Epstein sex-trafficking investigation. This is the latest escalation in months of congressional pressure on the department over transparency.
Bondi has stated that the DOJ has released all Epstein files in its possession. Mace and other lawmakers directly dispute this claim, asserting that millions more documents exist but have not been made public. Three million documents have been released so far, according to Mace, yet videos, audio recordings, and logs remain missing.
Congress members who have access to unredacted versions of the documents have made an even more serious allegation: that the DOJ has taken down some files that were previously available. After the Epstein Files Transparency Act passed nearly unanimously earlier this year, the DOJ was legally required to release all its files on the case. Instead, the department announced it would withhold millions of pages, citing unspecified reasons.
The gap between what the government claims it has released and what lawmakers say remains hidden has become the central tension driving this investigation. The subpoena compels Bondi to testify before the committee and explain the discrepancies.
Bondi now faces a legal obligation to appear before the committee and answer questions under oath about the DOJ's document retention and release decisions. The subpoena carries the weight of congressional authority and potential contempt charges if she refuses to comply. The committee has not yet announced a hearing date, but the vote makes it clear that both parties intend to get answers about what documents remain sealed and why.
Highlighted text was flagged by the council. Tap to see feedback.
