Nurul Amin Shah Alam, a 56-year-old Rohingya refugee who was nearly blind and did not speak English, was found dead on a downtown Buffalo street on Tuesday evening. He had been missing for five days after U.S. Border Patrol agents released him at a coffee shop miles from his home without notifying his family or lawyer.
On February 19, Border Patrol released Shah Alam from custody and dropped him at a coffee shop in Buffalo. The agents did not tell his family where he was. They did not tell his lawyer. They did not arrange transportation to his home or shelter. They did not verify he could survive on his own.
His family had moved away from the area. Shah Alam had no contacts, no money, no ability to see where he was going. He was alone in a city during winter without a support system.
Five days later, police found his body on the street.
The circumstances of Shah Alam's release raise basic questions about how federal immigration authorities handle vulnerable people in their custody. A refugee with serious vision impairment, no English language skills, and no local connections was released into winter weather without a plan for survival. No notification to family. No arrangement for shelter. No verification that he could care for himself.
Buffalo police are investigating the circumstances surrounding Shah Alam's death and his release from Border Patrol custody.
The Border Patrol's actions—releasing Shah Alam without notifying his family or lawyer, arranging shelter, or verifying he could survive—are now facing scrutiny from advocates and lawmakers. Advocates argue the case reveals systemic failures in how the agency treats vulnerable people in its custody.
For Shah Alam's family, the investigation cannot bring him back. For immigration advocates, his death demonstrates the consequences of a system that prioritizes processing over protection.
Nurul Amin Shah Alam, a 56-year-old Rohingya refugee who was nearly blind and did not speak English, was found dead on a downtown Buffalo street on Tuesday evening. He had been missing for five days after U.S. Border Patrol agents released him at a coffee shop miles from his home without notifying his family or lawyer.
Shah Alam was seriously ill. He had no way to navigate an unfamiliar city in winter. He had no way to call for help. He died on frozen pavement in a place he did not know.
On February 19, Border Patrol released Shah Alam from custody and dropped him at a coffee shop in Buffalo. The agents did not tell his family where he was. They did not tell his lawyer. They did not arrange transportation to his home or shelter. They did not verify he could survive on his own.
His family had moved away from the area. Shah Alam had no contacts, no money, no ability to see where he was going. He was alone in a city during winter with no support system and no way to ask for directions or help.
Five days later, police found his body on the street.
Shah Alam's death comes as public trust in Border Patrol operations is declining sharply. An NBC News poll this month found that 49% of Americans strongly disapprove of how the Trump administration has handled border security and immigration, up 15 percentage points since last April.
The circumstances of Shah Alam's release raise basic questions about how federal immigration authorities handle vulnerable people in their custody. A refugee with serious vision impairment, no English language skills, and no local connections was released into winter weather without a plan for survival. No notification to family. No arrangement for shelter. No verification that he could care for himself.
This is not a procedural failure. This is a person left to die on a street because no one checked whether he could survive what came next.
Buffalo police are investigating Shah Alam's death. The Border Patrol's decision to release him without notifying his family or lawyer, without arranging shelter, and without verifying he could survive the release, will face scrutiny from advocates and lawmakers who argue it reveals how the agency treats people in its custody when they become difficult to process.
For Shah Alam's family, the investigation cannot bring him back. For immigration advocates, his death is evidence of a system that treats vulnerable refugees as problems to be moved rather than people to be protected.
Highlighted text was flagged by the council. Tap to see feedback.
