Council News
Link copied

Supreme Court Declines Press Freedom Case, Weighs Mail-In Ballot Deadlines

Rights & Justice· 20 sources ·Updated 3h ago
Left
Center
Right
See why this story leans left

After review, the Council found the article's framing of Justice Sotomayor's dissent as a response to a "grave error" and its emphasis on the potential disenfranchisement of military and overseas voters due to ballot deadlines tilts the narrative slightly leftward.

See the council’s votes

The Supreme Court's decision to decline reviewing a press freedom case has implications for media rights and protections, potentially affecting how journalists operate and report in the U.S.

The Supreme Court's decision to decline reviewing a press freedom case is a landmark ruling that changes legal protections for journalism, impacting how media operates in the U.S.

See bias & truth review

Citizen Journalist's Case Rejected

The Supreme Court declined to hear a case brought by citizen journalist Priscilla Villarreal against officials in Laredo, Texas, concerning her arrest for publishing news stories after confirming details with a police officer in 2017. This decision leaves in place a lower court ruling that favored the officials. Villarreal, known online as "La Gordiloca," was arrested for publishing news stories about a border agent's public suicide and a car crash, after confirming details with a police officer.

James MadisonGrok

The sources also report that the Texas law allowing arrests for soliciting non-public information from officials had never been enforced before Villarreal's case.

Dissenting Opinion on First Amendment

Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented from the decision, calling the court's refusal to hear the case a "grave error." She argued that the arrest violated the First Amendment, stating it should have been obvious. Sotomayor wrote that the case "implicates one of the most basic journalistic practices of them all: asking sources within the government for information."

Qualified Immunity Shield

At issue was whether Laredo officials could claim "qualified immunity," protecting them from being sued. The 5th Circuit federal appeals court initially ruled for Villarreal, asserting that "a citizen journalist has the right to ask a public official a question, without fear of being imprisoned." However, the full 5th Circuit subsequently held that the officials were entitled to qualified immunity because they could have reasonably thought they were just enforcing the law. Villarreal's lawyers argued qualified immunity did not apply because officials would have known enforcing the state law was an obvious free speech violation. Defendants included former police chief Claudio Trevino and District Attorney Isidro Alaniz.

Mail-In Ballot Debate

The Supreme Court heard arguments regarding mail ballots postmarked by Election Day but received later. The case, Watson v. RNC, involves a challenge to a Mississippi law allowing ballots received up to five days after Election Day to be counted. More than a dozen states have similar laws. The Republican National Committee and the state GOP filed lawsuits challenging Mississippi's ballot-receipt deadline in 2024.

Justices' Skepticism and Concerns

Several conservative justices, including Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, appeared skeptical of state laws governing late-arriving ballots. Alito emphasized the literal meaning of the word "day" when determining when ballots should be accepted. Liberal justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, and Ketanji Brown Jackson defended the measures as an exercise of states' authority to set rules for federal elections. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett expressed concern about how invalidating deadlines for late-arriving ballots could affect election rules for early voting.

Potential Impact on Elections

A decision striking down the grace period could jeopardize the ability of 29 states and the District of Columbia to count some ballots from military and overseas voters that arrive after Election Day. There are nearly 4 million servicemembers and U.S. citizens living abroad who rely on mail ballots to vote. Four states—Kansas, North Dakota, Ohio, and Utah—passed laws last year eliminating grace periods and now require mail ballots to be received by Election Day in order to be counted.

Arguments for and Against Grace Periods

Mississippi Secretary of State Michael Watson is urging the Supreme Court to uphold the law, arguing that states have "broad power over elections." Lawyers for the RNC argued that the election ends when the ballot box is closed, not when voters make their selection. The Trump administration submitted a brief arguing that states cannot count ballots received after Election Day, aligning with the RNC's position. A decision is expected by the end of June or early July, leaving election officials in some states potentially scrambling to inform voters about changed deadlines before the November midterm elections.

How others covered this story
NPR Leans Left
Supreme Court declines to review press freedom case
NPR focuses on the implications of the Supreme Court's decision for press freedom, highlighting Justice Sotomayor's dissent and emphasizing the importance of journalists' ability to gather information from government sources.
Reason Leans Right
Justice Sotomayor on the Freedom of the Press and the Right to Ask Questions
Reason frames the story by focusing on Justice Sotomayor's dissent, presenting it as a strong argument against the denial of certiorari and emphasizing the potential violation of press freedom.

Sources (20)

Cross-referenced to ensure accuracy

NPR Supreme Court declines to review press freedom case
CBS News Supreme Court hears case over mail ballots that arrive after Election Day
CBS News Supreme Court hears dispute on late-arriving mail-in ballots
CBS News Early details on Supreme Court arguments over late-arriving mail ballots
NBC News Supreme Court appears skeptical of mail-in ballots that arrive after Election Day
NBC News Supreme Court rejects citizen journalist's case against Texas officials who arrested her for reporting
New York Times Supreme Court Appears Poised to Reject Late-Arriving Mail-In Ballots Law
The Hill Supreme Court seems wary of states counting mail ballots that arrive after Election Day
The Hill Redressing racism in the courts: The Rocky Myers case
The Hill Supreme Court backs officer seeking immunity from Vermont House protester’s excessive force claims
The Hill Supreme Court won’t hear Texas death row inmate’s bid for DNA testing again
Fox News Alito gives lawyers plain-English lesson on meaning of 'day' as Supreme Court weighs late-ballot fight
The Guardian US US supreme court appears poised to limit mail-in ballots ahead of midterms
Deutsche Welle German court rejects climate case against BMW, Mercedes
Reason Justice Sotomayor on the Freedom of the Press and the Right to Ask Questions
Reason Today in Supreme Court History: March 23, 1870
Mother Jones Trump Wants to End Mail Voting. The Supreme Court’s Conservative Justices Appear Eager to Assist.
PBS NewsHour Supreme Court rejects appeal from online citizen journalist over her arrest in Texas
PBS NewsHour Supreme Court rejects appeal from Texas death row inmate Rodney Reed over DNA testing
Bloomberg Supreme Court Signals Divide on Election-Day Ballot Deadline
Never miss a story.
Get the full experience. Free on iOS.
Download for iOS